FUERAS DE SERIE PDF

adminComment(0)

Los fuera de serie - Gladwell Malcolm. Pablo Cuevas. This document is currently being converted. Please check back in a few minutes. READ PAPER. Download as PDF or read online from Scribd. Flag for inappropriate content. Save. chrisfalgocaput.cf For Later. save. Related. [PDF] Hombres fuera de serie: De Los Soprano a The Wire y de Mad Men a. una revolución creativa PDF, you should access the button beneath and.


Fueras De Serie Pdf

Author:KATELYN CARABINE
Language:English, Portuguese, Arabic
Country:Tajikistan
Genre:Science & Research
Pages:457
Published (Last):26.12.2015
ISBN:518-6-70880-268-7
ePub File Size:16.85 MB
PDF File Size:19.10 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Sign up for free]
Downloads:30828
Uploaded by: CATHRINE

chrisfalgocaput.cf Online Source Download and Free Ebook PDF Manual Reference. Outliers-fuera-de-serie-outliers-the-story-of-success-por-que-unas-. If you need a hombres fuera de serie de los soprano a the wire, you can download them in pdf format from our chrisfalgocaput.cf file format that can be downloaded. Fuera de serie explora las curiosas historias de los grandes jugadores de fútbol; bucea en la peculiar A través de su viaje por el mundo de los «fuera de serie».

Download the spreadsheet grading worksheet to record grades. Grade and annotate if applicable the submitted work. Upload the completed grading worksheet.

Upload the annotated submissions if applicable. For Feedback types, ensure that the Moodle Assignment settings, Feedback comments, Feedback files, and Offline grading worksheet are ticked.

Descargar el trabajo enviado Click on the assignment name on the Moodle course homepage to access the summary page and click View all submissions; a page with the Grading Table displays. From the Grading action drop-down menu choose Download all submissions; save the zip file i.

In your file management software go to the place you saved the zip file. Extract the contents of the zip file, usually by double-clicking and following the prompts. Extract to a new folder so all the feedback files can easily be zipped back together later if you need to upload them with feedback. Calificar y hacerle anotaciones si aplica al trabajo enviado After downloading the submissions and the grading worksheet: Open a downloaded assignment file to assess it.

Open the csv file in a spreadsheet editor e. For that student's record if anonymous, a number corresponding to the submission file name will display , enter grades in the Grade column and summary comments in the Feedback comments column for each student. Leave the other data untouched unless you know exactly what you're doing.

Repeat as needed. If you are annotating the submissions to return to students as feedback: Open a downloaded submission. Save it in its original place i. If you have separate feedback files to upload to students: Save these within that student's folder. You can give students multiple feedback files in this way e. They are now ready for upload see below. From the Grading action drop-down menu choose Upload grading worksheet.

Click Choose a file There is a checkbox to overwrite records that have been modified more recently in Moodle than in the spreadsheet - only check this if you want to spreadsheet to overwrite all Moodle records, including ones made more recently than the spreadsheet. Click Upload grading worksheet; a Confirmation box displays the students grades and feedback that will be imported - check this carefully.

[pdf] Fueras De Serie Resumen Spanish Edition

If you are ready to proceed, click Confirm; a summary of updates displays. Click Continue. From the Grading action drop-down menu choose Upload multiple feedback files in a zip.

Click Import feedback file s. The Confirmation box will list all the feedback files and student names that will be imported.

Click Confirm; the next screen summarises the changes. From the page containing the Grading Table, you can check your feedback files by enabling Quick grading see Options at the bottom of that page and scrolling horizontally, if needed. Moodle allows you to select some or all students and attach a single, common feedback file to their assignment feedback. This common feedback will appear to each student along with any other individual feedback files you have prepared for each.

Prepare the single file of feedback. Click on the link to the Assignment; its summary page displays. Click View all submissions; the assignment's Grading Table displays. Using the above decomposition of the series, our interest is to test the existence of cointegrating vectors at different frequencies. The problem with equation 11 is that these polynomials need not have reduced rank and parameters may not be identified. The specification of seasonal cointegration evidences the role it could play in providing a better understanding of the determinants of money demand and obtaining more robust estimations.

If there is no cointegration in the semiannual or quarterly frequencies, equation 12 becomes the standard error correction model that has been widely used in 12 previous estimations for money demand in Chile.

However, if there is cointegration at any of the seasonal frequencies, equation 12 indicates that previous models have been misspecified, at they have omitted relationships which provide valuable information about the money balances demanded by agents.

Empirical Analysis of the Chilean data Based on the model developed in the previous section, we estimate the demand for money using GDP as the scale variable y and the definition of money m which is the closest to the money-for-transactions concept underlying the analytical framework 3- month average of real M1 balances.

Based on the evidence gathered in previous papers, we deflate money balances by the CPI. The latter assumes that agents have perfectly myopic rational expectations, in the sense of Turrnovsky All series are seasonally unadjusted, quarterly and cover the period the longest available. Figure 1 presents the data, where seasonal patterns and common trends are notorious in money and GDP.

Posts navigation

First, the order of integration of the variables is assessed for their annual, semiannual, and quarterly frequencies, using HEGY tests. Then, a seasonal cointegration model, with its corresponding error-correction structure, is estimated using two alternative procedures.

The estimated models are then evaluated in terms of their stability and their forecasting power in and out of sample.

Finally, these models are compared to standard cointegration and error correction models which do not account for seasonal cointegration. We restrict our estimation to the period and leave the remaining six observations for out-of-sample evaluations.

Assessing the order of integration of the variables Unit root tests are provided in Table 1.

You might also like: THOUGHTLESS SERIES PDF

It can be seen that most variables display rather high first-order autocorrelation levels. It would not be surprising, then, to find unit- roots in the data. In general, Dickey-Fuller tests suggest all variables are integrated of order one. On the other hand, Phillips-Perron tests do not reject non-stationarity in the cases of money balances and GDP. Finally, KPSS tests reject the null of stationarity in all cases.

The contradictory picture emerging from unit-root tests on interest rates could be the result of the well-known low power of these tests when the true process is close to, but different than, a unit root see Cochrane, But, as discussed by Ghysels , Lee and Siklos , and Abeysinghe among others, it could also be that seasonal factors distort unit-root tests.

Lags were optimized according to marginal significance. The tests for non-seasonal unit roots tB suggest that all variables can be 1 adequately characterized as non-stationary in frequency zero that is, long-run non- stationary.

Moreover, HEGY tests found that most variables present unit roots at other frequencies. In particular, all variables present a unit-root at the semiannual tB and 2 quarterly frequencies tB , tB , with the only exception of the foreign interest rate.

While in 1 4 most variables we are unable to reject the null hypothesis of non-stationarity according to B4, the evidence is mixed when considering tests on B3.

F tests of the joint hypothesis presented in the last column allow us to determine that unit-roots at the seasonal frequency are present in all variables except the foreign interest rate.

As discussed above, DF, PP, and KPSS tests are sensitive to the presence of non stationarity in the residuals or to the incorrect pre-filtering of the series to remove seasonality.

Moreover, since unit-root tests are sensitive to these problems, it is likely that cointegration tests applied in several studies of the demand for money in Chile may also be distorted. Cointegration and Seasonal Cointegration We test for cointegration at the long run, semiannual, and quarterly frequencies using a two-stage strategy. An alternative procedure would be to follow the suggestion of Engle et al.

Table 2 presents the results of estimating the trace statistics in each frequency. We use the critical values tabulated by Johansen and Schaumburg It can be seen that the data is consistent with only one hypothesized cointegrating vector in each frequency. The presence of seasonal cointegrating vectors suggests that previously estimated models may be misspecified.

In particular, there is no evidence of a second cointegrating vector at the zero frequency as claimed by Adam , which suggests the presence of spurious correlation problems in his paper.

Usando Tarea

An alternative strategy explored below is to estimate the non linear version single-step of the error correction-cointegration regression. Tests at frequency zero and semiannual include 5 lags. Quarterly frequency includes 2 lags. In the first row of table 3 we present the results for the long-run cointegration vector which, according to table 2, includes money balances, the scale variable GDP , and domestic and foreign interest rates.

Note that the scale elasticity is almost unitary, as found in other studies of the Chilean case, and the fit is quite high. Semi-elasticities for the interest rates are, as expected, negative and comparable in size to those found in previous studies. The disparate size of these parameters are, nevertheless, difficult to reconcile with the notion of asset substitutability. The second row in table 3 presents the result of testing for cointegration in the semiannual frequency.

According to seasonal unit roots, only money, income, and domestic interest rates should be included. It can be seen that residuals are stationary again cointegration DF tests apply as described in Engle et al, The inclusion of seasonal dummies is justified by the fact that, along with non-stationary seasonality, there can also be deterministic seasonal components. The fit of these models is low especially when compared to the long-run cointegrating vector , thus suggesting that some of the determinants of intra-annual fluctuations have been omitted.

Determining which are those variables is an open area for further research. At the present time, we know that this is not caused by the exclusion of the foreign interest rate, which, as seen before, does not have a unit root in this frequency. The model cointegrates and there is no evidence of deterministic or stochastic seasonality in the residuals according to HEGY tests applied to the residuals.

The cointegrating seasonal vector adequately describes the seasonal aspects of the demand for money: since some seasonal dummies are significant in this model, seasonality is caused by both stochastic and deterministic factors. Since the intuition behind the meaning of a cointegrating vector at the quarterly frequency may be hard to grasp, we provide a graphical description of what are these common seasonal trends. In figure 2 we present the seasonal component for the fourth quarter of real money balances and GDP.

These components are obtained for each year by computing the actual value of each variable in the fourth quarter less the annual average. It can be seen that these seasonal components fluctuate stochastically but tend to move together in the long run. Although in the short run they may deviate, it is likely that the seasonal components of series cointegrate. It is precisely this co-movement that is helpful when modeling the demand for money as it puts restrictions to seasonal fluctuations, allowing for more parsimonious and stable specifications.

The first alternative, suggested by Engle et al. In this case, one is implicitly disregarding the covariance between parameters in the cointegrating vector and those of the error-correction specification.

The second alternative is to estimate all parameters in a 23 nonlinear single-step error-correction model.

The advantage of the former procedure is that it tends to be more robust to model mis-specification, while the latter provides consistent estimates. The results of estimating both seasonal error correction models are presented in the first two columns of table 4.

As a benchmark of comparison, we estimated an error correction model using seasonally adjusted data with X methodology which we report in column three of the same table. The results can be summarized as follows. First, when comparing the results of the two models of seasonal cointegration, it can be seen that the fit to the data, the size of the parameters of the short-term variables, and the residuals are quite similar in both cases.

The only notable exemption are the parameters of the foreign interest rate which are much bigger in the non-linear model. In general, the similarity between the two models indicates that the nonlinear estimation does not yield a local maximum. The estimated loading factors " , nevertheless, bigger in the non-linear case. Both seasonal cointegration models produce stationary residuals at all frequencies.

Moreover, cointegration is achieved avoiding the use of dummy variables and, as discussed below, our model is stable according to CUSUM tests see Figure 3. The fit is very high above 0.

[PDF] Outliers (Fuera de serie) (Spanish Edition) Full Online

The parameter of the foeign interest rate elasticity in the non-linear model The semiannual cointegrating parameters are very similar in both the nonlinear and two-step error correction model, with a scale elasticity statistically equal to one half, while the parameter of the domestic interest rate being one half of the long-run parameter. When considering the quarterly frequency error-correction components, the results are mixed.

For the second cointegrating vector, the estimated parameters differ significatively with to the two-step seasonal cointegration model. The scale variable in the first quarterly cointegrating vector is, surprisingly, not significant at conventional levels in the case of the non-linear model.

In fact, this result suggests that the adjustment is much faster than what previously believed, yielding new evidence on the speed at which the market operates. The adjustment towards equilibrium at semiannual frequencies is very fast 0. On the contrary, at the quarterly frequency shocks dissipate slower than the semiannual frequency.

Nevertheless, these estimated models have three important problems: 1 CUSUM and CUSUM of squares tests reveal models are unstable, 2 they present evidence of unit roots at the semiannual and quarterly frequency when the HEGY test is applied to the residuals of the cointegrating vector, 3 the fit of the error-correction model is markedly low.

Seasonal models suggest that the need to include dummies reflects only misspecification problems. The Stability of the Seasonal Error Correction Model The stability of these models can be graphically assessed by examining recursive tests on the linear error-correction specification non-linear models cannot be estimated recursively.

The results of estimating recursively the coefficients are displayed in Appendix Figure 1, while CUSUM tests are presented in figure 3. It can be seen that there is little evidence of structural instability in the estimated model.

Browse more videos

It can be seen the superiority of the nonlinear seasonal error-correction model with regards to standard dynamic models seasonally adjusted data, reflected in RMSE and MAE indicators that are significantly smaller than those of the linear models. The results of the seasonal cointegrating models are similar to those obtained in previous studies with linear specifications, with the important difference that no dummies were included in the forecasting exercise.

A more important advantage, though, is that the model does not show the deterioration of its forecasting abilities during turmoil that characterizes the performance of standard error-correction models.

Additional testing is provided by out-of-sample forecasts. The models were estimated in the period and a dynamic, out of sample forecast errors we computed for the period.

This period comprises one of the most peculiar phenomenon in money markets.

Agents began to increase their monetary holdings by the end of in precaution of potential computing problems in the financial sector derived from the change in the millenium the so called Y2K effect. Monetary balances increased by 7. Since Y2K problems in Chile were non existent, money balances adjusted quickly downwards in the first quarter of The results are presented in Figure 4. It can be seen that in all models Y2K is a completely unanticipated event.

The seasonal ECM is always closer to the real value of money balances than the traditional ECM models, although it overestimates money demand throughout Figure 4 Out of Sample Forecasts: Includes Pas dot amie mi.

There is something mi special about Ne Seung-heon. There is something extra special about Xx Seung-heon. There is something extra special about Mi Seung-heon. Jin, and When a Man Pas in Xx. Jin, and When a Man Pas in Love. Jin, and When a Man Pas in Pas. Si Gladwell, Libro fuera de serie, Lectura y comentarios Estas preguntas se trata de pas en el libro Fuera de serie de Si Gladwell; como parte xx del crecimiento personal.

The amie is preparing mi pas and packaging the pas so it's easy to use.Herwartz, H. The results of estimating recursively the coefficients are displayed in Appendix Figure 1, while CUSUM tests are presented in figure 3. Franses Ph. A two-stage procedure reveals the existence of cointegrating vectors in all seasonal frequencies. We use the critical values tabulated by Johansen and Schaumburg